Wiki source code of 5.1.2.3 Citizens trust in decision-making
Version 1.1 by Emily West on 2022/02/16 15:12
Show last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | = 5.1.2.3 Citizens trust in decision-making = | ||
| 2 | |||
| 3 | (% class="table-bordered" %) | ||
| 4 | |(% style="width:211px" %)((( | ||
| 5 | ====== **Social challenge/ impact linked to:** ====== | ||
| 6 | )))|(% style="width:730px" %)Social | ||
| 7 | |(% style="width:211px" %)((( | ||
| 8 | ====== **Level of importance** ====== | ||
| 9 | )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( | ||
| 10 | **1** - High Importance / must have | ||
| 11 | ))) | ||
| 12 | |(% style="width:211px" %)((( | ||
| 13 | ====== **Description** ====== | ||
| 14 | )))|(% style="width:730px" %)Citizen trust in decision-making processes which effect them can be enhanced through engagement, participation and accountability (Kumagai & Iorio) | ||
| 15 | |(% style="width:211px" %)((( | ||
| 16 | ====== **Scale as linked to D2.2 framework** ====== | ||
| 17 | )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( | ||
| 18 | * City | ||
| 19 | * Neighborhood | ||
| 20 | * Project Area | ||
| 21 | ))) | ||
| 22 | |(% style="width:211px" %)((( | ||
| 23 | ====== **Data source and input type** ====== | ||
| 24 | )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( | ||
| 25 | * Survey respondents | ||
| 26 | ))) | ||
| 27 | |(% style="width:211px" %)((( | ||
| 28 | ====== **Connection with SDGs** ====== | ||
| 29 | )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( | ||
| 30 | * Goal 16: Peace, justice and strong institutions | ||
| 31 | ))) | ||
| 32 | |(% style="width:211px" %)((( | ||
| 33 | ====== **Required Data** ====== | ||
| 34 | )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( | ||
| 35 | * Survey question: | ||
| 36 | ** To what extent do you trust those making decisions about the nature based solutions to be implemented in this project? | ||
| 37 | ))) | ||
| 38 | |(% style="width:211px" %)((( | ||
| 39 | ====== **Expected Outputs** ====== | ||
| 40 | )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( | ||
| 41 | * Survey responses | ||
| 42 | ))) | ||
| 43 | |(% style="width:211px" %)((( | ||
| 44 | ====== **Calculation methods** ====== | ||
| 45 | )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( | ||
| 46 | * Though each trust measurement is disputed, trust has been measured in three ways: (i) subjective and direct through perception surveys; (ii) objective and indirect through objective data used as proxies (Kucher and Götte 1998); and (iii) through experimental measures of trust using behavioral games (Glaeser et al. 2000; Habyarimana et al. 2009). S | ||
| 47 | ))) | ||
| 48 | |(% style="width:211px" %)((( | ||
| 49 | ====== **Level of expertise required** ====== | ||
| 50 | )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( | ||
| 51 | * Basic | ||
| 52 | ))) | ||
| 53 | |(% style="width:211px" %)((( | ||
| 54 | ====== **Links and references** ====== | ||
| 55 | )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( | ||
| 56 | * Kumagai, Saki & Iorio, Federica. Building Trust in Government through Citizen Engagement. //World Bank Group. //[[Building-Trust-in-Government-through-Citizen-Engagement.pdf (worldbank.org)>>url:https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/33346/Building-Trust-in-Government-through-Citizen-Engagement.pdf?sequence=5]] | ||
| 57 | ))) | ||
| 58 | |||
| 59 | (% class="lead" %) | ||
| 60 | Revisions | ||
| 61 | |||
| 62 | (% class="success" %)|(% style="width:68px" %)**Version**|(% style="width:179px" %)**Name**|(% style="width:112px" %)**Date**|(% style="width:636px" %)**Changes made** | ||
| 63 | (% class="active" %)|(% style="width:68px" %)**0.1**|(% style="width:179px" %) |(% style="width:112px" %) |(% style="width:636px" %)Factsheet created | ||
| 64 | (% class="active" %)|(% style="width:68px" %) |(% style="width:179px" %) |(% style="width:112px" %) |(% style="width:636px" %) | ||
| 65 | |||
| 66 |
