Wiki source code of Initial costs of NBS implementation
Version 3.1 by Hyunji Cho on 2022/02/21 10:34
Hide last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
| |
1.1 | 1 | = Initial costs of NBS implementation = |
| 2 | |||
| 3 | |((( | ||
| 4 | ====== **Social challenge/ impact linked to:** ====== | ||
| 5 | )))|Economic | ||
| 6 | |((( | ||
| 7 | ====== **Level of importance** ====== | ||
| 8 | )))|((( | ||
| 9 | **1** - High Importance / must have | ||
| 10 | ))) | ||
| 11 | |((( | ||
| 12 | ====== **Description** ====== | ||
| 13 | )))|((( | ||
| 14 | Indicators of Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Intervention subcriterion will assess the financial feasibility of the project scenario. | ||
| 15 | |||
| 16 | Project's initial costs are those occurring during the design and construction phases. | ||
| 17 | ))) | ||
| 18 | |((( | ||
| 19 | ====== **Scale as linked to D2.2 framework** ====== | ||
| 20 | )))|((( | ||
| 21 | |||
| 22 | |||
| 23 | * Project Area | ||
| 24 | ))) | ||
| 25 | |((( | ||
| 26 | ====== **Data source and input type** ====== | ||
| 27 | )))|((( | ||
| 28 | * ((( | ||
| |
2.1 | 29 | the technical stakeholders can contribute to the provision of data needed for the estimation model implementation. |
| |
1.1 | 30 | ))) |
| 31 | * | ||
| 32 | ))) | ||
| 33 | |((( | ||
| 34 | ====== **Connection with SDGs** ====== | ||
| 35 | )))|((( | ||
| 36 | |||
| 37 | |||
| 38 | * Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production | ||
| 39 | ))) | ||
| 40 | |((( | ||
| 41 | ====== **Required Data** ====== | ||
| 42 | )))|((( | ||
| 43 | * Parametric costs; At the beginning of the project. | ||
| 44 | ))) | ||
| 45 | |((( | ||
| 46 | ====== **Expected Outputs** ====== | ||
| 47 | )))|((( | ||
| 48 | * estimated initial cost (€) | ||
| 49 | ))) | ||
| 50 | |((( | ||
| 51 | ====== **Calculation methods** ====== | ||
| 52 | )))|((( | ||
| 53 | * ((( | ||
| 54 | Different methods can be used to assess initial cost and the choice among them depends on the detail of the available data and of the evaluation itself. These methods can be classified in three different approaches: | ||
| 55 | ))) | ||
| 56 | * ((( | ||
| 57 | 1) Top-down synthetic approach: when few and generic information is available, the estimation can be carried out by analogy with existing projects or by experts opinions; | ||
| 58 | |||
| 59 | 2) Bottom-up analytical approach: when more and detailed information is available, the estimation can be carried out using the work (cost) breakdown structure; | ||
| 60 | |||
| 61 | 3) Parametric approach: the estimation is carried out by analogy with existing projects but high quality data are needed. | ||
| 62 | ))) | ||
| 63 | ))) | ||
| 64 | |((( | ||
| 65 | ====== **Level of expertise required** ====== | ||
| 66 | )))|((( | ||
| 67 | * High | ||
| |
2.1 | 68 | * Given the high degree of expertise needed to calculate this indicator, |
| |
1.1 | 69 | ))) |
| 70 | |((( | ||
| 71 | ====== **Links and references** ====== | ||
| 72 | )))|((( | ||
| |
2.1 | 73 | * Cerezo-Narváez, A.; Pastor-Fernández, A.; Otero-Mateo, M.; Ballesteros-Pérez, P. Integration of Cost and Work Breakdown Structures in the Management of Construction Projects. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 1386. |
| |
1.1 | 74 | ))) |
| 75 | |||
| 76 | Revisions | ||
| 77 | |||
| 78 | |**Version**|**Name**|**Date**|**Changes made** | ||
| |
3.1 | 79 | |**0.1**|Hyunji (EcoWise)|21/02/2022|Factsheet created |
| |
1.1 | 80 | | | | | |
| 81 | |||
| 82 |