Changes for page 1.2.4 Level of Digital Participation

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
1	1	= 1.2.4 Level of Digital Participation =
2	2
	3	+New indicator
	4	+
	5	+Linked to project: U_CODE (Urban Collective Design Environment)
	6	+
3	3	(% class="table-bordered" %)
4	4	|(% style="width:211px" %)(((
5	5	====== **Social challenge/ impact linked to:** ======
...	...	@@ -12,82 +12,73 @@
12	12	|(% style="width:211px" %)(((
13	13	====== **Level of importance** ======
14	14	)))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
15		-Delete as appropriate:
	19	+**2** - Medium Importance / good to have
	20	+)))
	21	+|(% style="width:211px" %)(((
	22	+====== **Description** ======
	23	+)))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
	24	+From the [[Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging>>url:https://link.springer.com/referencework/10.1007/978-3-030-22009-9]] (Seifert & Rössel, 2021).
16	16
17		-**1** - High Importance / must have
	26	+The term //digital participation// refers to the active involvement in digital society through the use of modern information and communication technology (ICT), such as the Internet. This participation includes access to not only the Internet but also various online services and content. Non-participation in the digital world could lead to a feeling of social exclusion, whereas a feeling of social inclusion may be induced by having access to the Internet as well as the willingness and skills to use it.
18	18
19		-**2** - Medium Importance / good to have
	28	+Participation is important to ensure just and equal measures. Increasingly this must involve digital participation to allow the involvement of larger and more diverse actors in decision-making (Hofmann et al. 2020).  Several components are important for participation to be successful and fair:
20	20
21		-**3** - Low importance / Not needed
	30	+* representativeness of 6+1 groups proportional to their
	31	+* Inclusiveness (the opportunity and ability of all participants to equally contribute)
	32	+* Internal transparency (at any time in the process it should be clear where the process is headed and what + why the next step is being taken)
	33	+* facilitation of deliberation (participants must understand each other and take on others' perspectives).
	34	+
	35	+Internet access has been desribed as a "right", and furthermore its iequality is revealed by the link between digital exclusion and social deprivation (Digital Scotland).
22	22	)))
23	23	|(% style="width:211px" %)(((
24		-====== **Description** ======
25		-)))|(% style="width:730px" %)
26		-|(% style="width:211px" %)(((
27	27	====== **Scale as linked to D2.2 framework** ======
28	28	)))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
29		-Delete as appropriate:
30		-
31	31	* National
32	32	* City
33	33	* Neighborhood
34	34	* Project Area
35		-* Street
36		-* Household
37		-* Object
38	38	)))
39	39	|(% style="width:211px" %)(((
40	40	====== **Data source and input type** ======
41	41	)))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
42		-*
	48	+* Private sector data from technology companies
43	43	)))
44	44	|(% style="width:211px" %)(((
45	45	====== **Connection with SDGs** ======
46	46	)))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
47		-Delete as appropriate:
48		-
49		-* Goal 1: No poverty
50		-* Goal 2: Zero hunger
51		-* Goal 3: Good health and well-being
52		-* Goal 4: Quality education
53		-* Goal 5: Gender equality
54		-* Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation
55		-* Goal 7: Affordable and clean energy
56		-* Goal 8: Decent work and economic growth
57		-* Goal 9: Industry, innovation and infrastructure
58	58	* Goal 10: Reduced inequalities
59		-* Goal 11: Sustainable cities and communities
60		-* Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production
61		-* Goal 13: Climate action
62		-* Goal 14: Life below water
63		-* Goal 15: Life on land
64		-* Goal 16: Peace, justice and strong institutions
65		-* Goal 17: Partnerships for the goals
66	66	)))
67	67	|(% style="width:211px" %)(((
68	68	====== **Required Data** ======
69	69	)))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
70		-*
	58	+* Broadband subscriptions
	59	+* Density of discrete domain names and websites in communities, per 100 people
71	71	)))
72	72	|(% style="width:211px" %)(((
73	73	====== **Expected Outputs** ======
74	74	)))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
75		-*
	64	+* Correlation between economic deprivation indices and participation in digital technology
76	76	)))
77	77	|(% style="width:211px" %)(((
78	78	====== **Calculation methods** ======
79	79	)))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
80		-*
	69	+* Uptake of broadbands
	70	+* Soioeconomic background on those who do not have broadband connection
	71	+* Population distribution
81	81	)))
82	82	|(% style="width:211px" %)(((
83	83	====== **Level of expertise required** ======
84	84	)))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
85		-*
	76	+* High
86	86	)))
87	87	|(% style="width:211px" %)(((
88	88	====== **Links and references** ======
89	89	)))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
90		-* Seele, P., Jia, C.D. and Helbing, D., 2019. The new silk road and its potential for sustainable development: how open digital participation could make BRI a role model for sustainable businesses and markets. //Asian journal of sustainability and social responsibility//, //4//(1), pp.1-7.
	81	+* Seifert, A. and Rössel, J., 2021. Digital participation. In //Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging// (pp. 1446-1450). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
	82	+* Hofmann, M., Münster, S. and Noennig, J.R., 2020. A theoretical framework for the evaluation of massive digital participation systems in urban planning. //Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis//, //4//(1), pp.1-12.
	83	+* Morrison, C., 2016. Digital participation: a national framework for local action. Digital Scotland.
	84	+* [[white_paper_vf-final-march2020.pdf (asu.edu)>>https://techdatasociety.asu.edu/sites/default/files/white_paper_vf-final-march2020.pdf]]
	85	+* [[How to make digital participation inclusive? (citizenlab.co)>>url:https://www.citizenlab.co/blog/civic-tech/how-to-make-digital-participation-inclusive/]]
91	91	)))
92	92
93	93	(% class="lead" %)