Skip to Content
Last modified by Hyunji Cho on 2022/03/07 16:37
From version 10.1
edited by Hyunji Cho
on 2022/03/07 16:36
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 6.1
edited by Emily West
on 2022/03/04 10:54
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.hyunjicho
1 +XWiki.emilywest
Content
... ... @@ -32,20 +32,25 @@
32 32  * Internal transparency (at any time in the process it should be clear where the process is headed and what + why the next step is being taken)
33 33  * facilitation of deliberation (participants must understand each other and take on others' perspectives).
34 34  
35 -Internet access has been desribed as a "right", and furthermore its iequality is revealed by the link between digital exclusion and social deprivation (Digital Scotland).
35 +
36 36  )))
37 37  |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
38 38  ====== **Scale as linked to D2.2 framework** ======
39 39  )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
40 +Delete as appropriate:
41 +
40 40  * National
41 41  * City
42 42  * Neighborhood
43 43  * Project Area
46 +* Street
47 +* Household
48 +* Object
44 44  )))
45 45  |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
46 46  ====== **Data source and input type** ======
47 47  )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
48 -* Private sector data from technology companies
53 +*
49 49  )))
50 50  |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
51 51  ====== **Connection with SDGs** ======
... ... @@ -55,25 +55,22 @@
55 55  |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
56 56  ====== **Required Data** ======
57 57  )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
58 -actual digital participation measured during processes
59 -
60 -Number of green blockchain contracts downloaded following intervention
63 +*
61 61  )))
62 62  |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
63 63  ====== **Expected Outputs** ======
64 -)))|(% style="width:730px" %)Stats on populations digital access allowing for online participation (1.1.7) vs actual digital participation measured during processes. 
65 -Number of green blockchain contracts downloaded following intervention.
67 +)))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
68 +*
69 +)))
66 66  |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
67 67  ====== **Calculation methods** ======
68 68  )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
69 -* Uptake of broadbands
70 -* Soioeconomic background on those who do not have broadband connection
71 -* Population distribution
73 +*
72 72  )))
73 73  |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
74 74  ====== **Level of expertise required** ======
75 75  )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
76 -* High
78 +*
77 77  )))
78 78  |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
79 79  ====== **Links and references** ======
... ... @@ -80,9 +80,7 @@
80 80  )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
81 81  * Seifert, A. and Rössel, J., 2021. Digital participation. In //Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging// (pp. 1446-1450). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
82 82  * Hofmann, M., Münster, S. and Noennig, J.R., 2020. A theoretical framework for the evaluation of massive digital participation systems in urban planning. //Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis//, //4//(1), pp.1-12.
83 -* Morrison, C., 2016. Digital participation: a national framework for local action. Digital Scotland.
84 -* [[white_paper_vf-final-march2020.pdf (asu.edu)>>https://techdatasociety.asu.edu/sites/default/files/white_paper_vf-final-march2020.pdf]]
85 -* [[How to make digital participation inclusive? (citizenlab.co)>>url:https://www.citizenlab.co/blog/civic-tech/how-to-make-digital-participation-inclusive/]]
85 +* Seele, P., Jia, C.D. and Helbing, D., 2019. The new silk road and its potential for sustainable development: how open digital participation could make BRI a role model for sustainable businesses and markets. //Asian journal of sustainability and social responsibility//, //4//(1), pp.1-7.
86 86  )))
87 87  
88 88  (% class="lead" %)