Skip to Content
Last modified by Hyunji Cho on 2022/03/07 16:37
From version 10.1
edited by Hyunji Cho
on 2022/03/07 16:36
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 7.1
edited by Emily West
on 2022/03/04 11:18
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.hyunjicho
1 +XWiki.emilywest
Content
... ... @@ -32,15 +32,21 @@
32 32  * Internal transparency (at any time in the process it should be clear where the process is headed and what + why the next step is being taken)
33 33  * facilitation of deliberation (participants must understand each other and take on others' perspectives).
34 34  
35 +
35 35  Internet access has been desribed as a "right", and furthermore its iequality is revealed by the link between digital exclusion and social deprivation (Digital Scotland).
36 36  )))
37 37  |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
38 38  ====== **Scale as linked to D2.2 framework** ======
39 39  )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
41 +Delete as appropriate:
42 +
40 40  * National
41 41  * City
42 42  * Neighborhood
43 43  * Project Area
47 +* Street
48 +* Household
49 +* Object
44 44  )))
45 45  |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
46 46  ====== **Data source and input type** ======
... ... @@ -55,20 +55,20 @@
55 55  |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
56 56  ====== **Required Data** ======
57 57  )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
58 -actual digital participation measured during processes
59 -
60 -Number of green blockchain contracts downloaded following intervention
64 +* Broadband subscriptions
65 +* Density of discrete domain names and websites in communities
61 61  )))
62 62  |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
63 63  ====== **Expected Outputs** ======
64 -)))|(% style="width:730px" %)Stats on populations digital access allowing for online participation (1.1.7) vs actual digital participation measured during processes. 
65 -Number of green blockchain contracts downloaded following intervention.
69 +)))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
70 +* Correlation between economic deprivation indices and participation in digital technology
71 +)))
66 66  |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
67 67  ====== **Calculation methods** ======
68 68  )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
69 69  * Uptake of broadbands
70 70  * Soioeconomic background on those who do not have broadband connection
71 -* Population distribution
77 +*
72 72  )))
73 73  |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
74 74  ====== **Level of expertise required** ======
... ... @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
82 82  * Hofmann, M., Münster, S. and Noennig, J.R., 2020. A theoretical framework for the evaluation of massive digital participation systems in urban planning. //Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis//, //4//(1), pp.1-12.
83 83  * Morrison, C., 2016. Digital participation: a national framework for local action. Digital Scotland.
84 84  * [[white_paper_vf-final-march2020.pdf (asu.edu)>>https://techdatasociety.asu.edu/sites/default/files/white_paper_vf-final-march2020.pdf]]
85 -* [[How to make digital participation inclusive? (citizenlab.co)>>url:https://www.citizenlab.co/blog/civic-tech/how-to-make-digital-participation-inclusive/]]
91 +* Seele, P., Jia, C.D. and Helbing, D., 2019. The new silk road and its potential for sustainable development: how open digital participation could make BRI a role model for sustainable businesses and markets. //Asian journal of sustainability and social responsibility//, //4//(1), pp.1-7.
86 86  )))
87 87  
88 88  (% class="lead" %)