Changes for page 1.2.4 Level of Digital Participation
Last modified by Hyunji Cho on 2022/03/07 16:37
From version 4.1
edited by Emily West
on 2022/03/04 10:40
on 2022/03/04 10:40
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 2.1
edited by Emily West
on 2022/03/03 15:26
on 2022/03/03 15:26
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@ 1 1 = 1.2.4 Level of Digital Participation = 2 2 3 -Project: U_CODE (Urban Collective Design Environment) 4 - 5 5 (% class="table-bordered" %) 6 6 |(% style="width:211px" %)((( 7 7 ====== **Social challenge/ impact linked to:** ====== ... ... @@ -14,20 +14,17 @@ 14 14 |(% style="width:211px" %)((( 15 15 ====== **Level of importance** ====== 16 16 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( 15 +Delete as appropriate: 16 + 17 +**1** - High Importance / must have 18 + 17 17 **2** - Medium Importance / good to have 20 + 21 +**3** - Low importance / Not needed 18 18 ))) 19 19 |(% style="width:211px" %)((( 20 20 ====== **Description** ====== 21 -)))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( 22 -Participation is important to ensure just and equal measures. Increasingly this must involve digital participation to allow the involvement of larger and more diverse actors in decision-making (Hofmann et al. 2020). Several components are important for participation to be successful and fair: 23 - 24 -* representativeness of 6+1 groups proportional to their 25 -* Inclusiveness (the opportunity and ability of all participants to equally contribute) 26 -* Internal transparency (at any time in the process it should be clear where the process is headed and what + why the next step is being taken) 27 -* facilitation of deliberation (participants must understand each other and take on others' perspectives). 28 - 29 - 30 -))) 25 +)))|(% style="width:730px" %) 31 31 |(% style="width:211px" %)((( 32 32 ====== **Scale as linked to D2.2 framework** ====== 33 33 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( ... ... @@ -49,7 +49,25 @@ 49 49 |(% style="width:211px" %)((( 50 50 ====== **Connection with SDGs** ====== 51 51 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( 47 +Delete as appropriate: 48 + 49 +* Goal 1: No poverty 50 +* Goal 2: Zero hunger 51 +* Goal 3: Good health and well-being 52 +* Goal 4: Quality education 53 +* Goal 5: Gender equality 54 +* Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation 55 +* Goal 7: Affordable and clean energy 56 +* Goal 8: Decent work and economic growth 57 +* Goal 9: Industry, innovation and infrastructure 52 52 * Goal 10: Reduced inequalities 59 +* Goal 11: Sustainable cities and communities 60 +* Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production 61 +* Goal 13: Climate action 62 +* Goal 14: Life below water 63 +* Goal 15: Life on land 64 +* Goal 16: Peace, justice and strong institutions 65 +* Goal 17: Partnerships for the goals 53 53 ))) 54 54 |(% style="width:211px" %)((( 55 55 ====== **Required Data** ====== ... ... @@ -74,7 +74,6 @@ 74 74 |(% style="width:211px" %)((( 75 75 ====== **Links and references** ====== 76 76 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( 77 -* Hofmann, M., Münster, S. and Noennig, J.R., 2020. A theoretical framework for the evaluation of massive digital participation systems in urban planning. //Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis//, //4//(1), pp.1-12. 78 78 * Seele, P., Jia, C.D. and Helbing, D., 2019. The new silk road and its potential for sustainable development: how open digital participation could make BRI a role model for sustainable businesses and markets. //Asian journal of sustainability and social responsibility//, //4//(1), pp.1-7. 79 79 ))) 80 80