Changes for page 1.2.4 Level of Digital Participation
Last modified by Hyunji Cho on 2022/03/07 16:37
From version 5.1
edited by Emily West
on 2022/03/04 10:40
on 2022/03/04 10:40
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 2.1
edited by Emily West
on 2022/03/03 15:26
on 2022/03/03 15:26
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,9 +1,5 @@ 1 1 = 1.2.4 Level of Digital Participation = 2 2 3 -New indicator 4 - 5 -Linked to project: U_CODE (Urban Collective Design Environment) 6 - 7 7 (% class="table-bordered" %) 8 8 |(% style="width:211px" %)((( 9 9 ====== **Social challenge/ impact linked to:** ====== ... ... @@ -16,20 +16,17 @@ 16 16 |(% style="width:211px" %)((( 17 17 ====== **Level of importance** ====== 18 18 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( 15 +Delete as appropriate: 16 + 17 +**1** - High Importance / must have 18 + 19 19 **2** - Medium Importance / good to have 20 + 21 +**3** - Low importance / Not needed 20 20 ))) 21 21 |(% style="width:211px" %)((( 22 22 ====== **Description** ====== 23 -)))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( 24 -Participation is important to ensure just and equal measures. Increasingly this must involve digital participation to allow the involvement of larger and more diverse actors in decision-making (Hofmann et al. 2020). Several components are important for participation to be successful and fair: 25 - 26 -* representativeness of 6+1 groups proportional to their 27 -* Inclusiveness (the opportunity and ability of all participants to equally contribute) 28 -* Internal transparency (at any time in the process it should be clear where the process is headed and what + why the next step is being taken) 29 -* facilitation of deliberation (participants must understand each other and take on others' perspectives). 30 - 31 - 32 -))) 25 +)))|(% style="width:730px" %) 33 33 |(% style="width:211px" %)((( 34 34 ====== **Scale as linked to D2.2 framework** ====== 35 35 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( ... ... @@ -51,7 +51,25 @@ 51 51 |(% style="width:211px" %)((( 52 52 ====== **Connection with SDGs** ====== 53 53 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( 47 +Delete as appropriate: 48 + 49 +* Goal 1: No poverty 50 +* Goal 2: Zero hunger 51 +* Goal 3: Good health and well-being 52 +* Goal 4: Quality education 53 +* Goal 5: Gender equality 54 +* Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation 55 +* Goal 7: Affordable and clean energy 56 +* Goal 8: Decent work and economic growth 57 +* Goal 9: Industry, innovation and infrastructure 54 54 * Goal 10: Reduced inequalities 59 +* Goal 11: Sustainable cities and communities 60 +* Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production 61 +* Goal 13: Climate action 62 +* Goal 14: Life below water 63 +* Goal 15: Life on land 64 +* Goal 16: Peace, justice and strong institutions 65 +* Goal 17: Partnerships for the goals 55 55 ))) 56 56 |(% style="width:211px" %)((( 57 57 ====== **Required Data** ====== ... ... @@ -76,7 +76,6 @@ 76 76 |(% style="width:211px" %)((( 77 77 ====== **Links and references** ====== 78 78 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( 79 -* Hofmann, M., Münster, S. and Noennig, J.R., 2020. A theoretical framework for the evaluation of massive digital participation systems in urban planning. //Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis//, //4//(1), pp.1-12. 80 80 * Seele, P., Jia, C.D. and Helbing, D., 2019. The new silk road and its potential for sustainable development: how open digital participation could make BRI a role model for sustainable businesses and markets. //Asian journal of sustainability and social responsibility//, //4//(1), pp.1-7. 81 81 ))) 82 82