Skip to Content
Last modified by Hyunji Cho on 2022/03/07 16:37
From version 6.1
edited by Emily West
on 2022/03/04 10:54
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 11.1
edited by Hyunji Cho
on 2022/03/07 16:37
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.emilywest
1 +XWiki.hyunjicho
Content
... ... @@ -32,26 +32,18 @@
32 32  * Internal transparency (at any time in the process it should be clear where the process is headed and what + why the next step is being taken)
33 33  * facilitation of deliberation (participants must understand each other and take on others' perspectives).
34 34  
35 -
35 +Internet access has been desribed as a "right", and furthermore its iequality is revealed by the link between digital exclusion and social deprivation (Digital Scotland).
36 36  )))
37 37  |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
38 38  ====== **Scale as linked to D2.2 framework** ======
39 39  )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
40 -Delete as appropriate:
40 +
41 41  
42 -* National
43 -* City
44 -* Neighborhood
45 45  * Project Area
46 -* Street
47 -* Household
48 -* Object
49 49  )))
50 50  |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
51 51  ====== **Data source and input type** ======
52 -)))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
53 -*
54 -)))
46 +)))|(% style="width:730px" %)data collected manually by the project personnel
55 55  |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
56 56  ====== **Connection with SDGs** ======
57 57  )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
... ... @@ -60,22 +60,23 @@
60 60  |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
61 61  ====== **Required Data** ======
62 62  )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
63 -*
55 +actual digital participation measured during processes
56 +
57 +Number of green blockchain contracts downloaded following intervention
64 64  )))
65 65  |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
66 66  ====== **Expected Outputs** ======
67 -)))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
68 -*
69 -)))
61 +)))|(% style="width:730px" %)Stats on populations digital access allowing for online participation (1.1.7) vs actual digital participation measured during processes. 
62 +Number of green blockchain contracts downloaded following intervention.
70 70  |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
71 71  ====== **Calculation methods** ======
72 72  )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
73 -*
66 +
74 74  )))
75 75  |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
76 76  ====== **Level of expertise required** ======
77 77  )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
78 -*
71 +* High
79 79  )))
80 80  |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
81 81  ====== **Links and references** ======
... ... @@ -82,7 +82,9 @@
82 82  )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
83 83  * Seifert, A. and Rössel, J., 2021. Digital participation. In //Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging// (pp. 1446-1450). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
84 84  * Hofmann, M., Münster, S. and Noennig, J.R., 2020. A theoretical framework for the evaluation of massive digital participation systems in urban planning. //Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis//, //4//(1), pp.1-12.
85 -* Seele, P., Jia, C.D. and Helbing, D., 2019. The new silk road and its potential for sustainable development: how open digital participation could make BRI a role model for sustainable businesses and markets. //Asian journal of sustainability and social responsibility//, //4//(1), pp.1-7.
78 +* Morrison, C., 2016. Digital participation: a national framework for local action. Digital Scotland.
79 +* [[white_paper_vf-final-march2020.pdf (asu.edu)>>https://techdatasociety.asu.edu/sites/default/files/white_paper_vf-final-march2020.pdf]]
80 +* [[How to make digital participation inclusive? (citizenlab.co)>>url:https://www.citizenlab.co/blog/civic-tech/how-to-make-digital-participation-inclusive/]]
86 86  )))
87 87  
88 88  (% class="lead" %)