Changes for page 1.2.4 Level of Digital Participation

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -1,9 +1,5 @@
1	1	= 1.2.4 Level of Digital Participation =
2	2
3		-New indicator
4		-
5		-Linked to project: U_CODE (Urban Collective Design Environment)
6		-
7	7	(% class="table-bordered" %)
8	8	|(% style="width:211px" %)(((
9	9	====== **Social challenge/ impact linked to:** ======
...	...	@@ -16,26 +16,18 @@
16	16	|(% style="width:211px" %)(((
17	17	====== **Level of importance** ======
18	18	)))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
19		-**2** - Medium Importance / good to have
20		-)))
21		-|(% style="width:211px" %)(((
22		-====== **Description** ======
23		-)))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
24		-From the [[Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging>>url:https://link.springer.com/referencework/10.1007/978-3-030-22009-9]] (Seifert & Rössel, 2021).
	15	+Delete as appropriate:
25	25
26		-The term //digital participation// refers to the active involvement in digital society through the use of modern information and communication technology (ICT), such as the Internet. This participation includes access to not only the Internet but also various online services and content. Non-participation in the digital world could lead to a feeling of social exclusion, whereas a feeling of social inclusion may be induced by having access to the Internet as well as the willingness and skills to use it.
	17	+**1** - High Importance / must have
27	27
28		-Participation is important to ensure just and equal measures. Increasingly this must involve digital participation to allow the involvement of larger and more diverse actors in decision-making (Hofmann et al. 2020).  Several components are important for participation to be successful and fair:
	19	+**2** - Medium Importance / good to have
29	29
30		-* representativeness of 6+1 groups proportional to their
31		-* Inclusiveness (the opportunity and ability of all participants to equally contribute)
32		-* Internal transparency (at any time in the process it should be clear where the process is headed and what + why the next step is being taken)
33		-* facilitation of deliberation (participants must understand each other and take on others' perspectives).
34		-
35		-
36		-Internet access has been desribed as a "right", and furthermore its iequality is revealed by the link between digital exclusion and social deprivation (Digital Scotland).
	21	+**3** - Low importance / Not needed
37	37	)))
38	38	|(% style="width:211px" %)(((
	24	+====== **Description** ======
	25	+)))|(% style="width:730px" %)
	26	+|(% style="width:211px" %)(((
39	39	====== **Scale as linked to D2.2 framework** ======
40	40	)))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
41	41	Delete as appropriate:
...	...	@@ -51,43 +51,54 @@
51	51	|(% style="width:211px" %)(((
52	52	====== **Data source and input type** ======
53	53	)))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
54		-* Private sector data from technology companies
	42	+*
55	55	)))
56	56	|(% style="width:211px" %)(((
57	57	====== **Connection with SDGs** ======
58	58	)))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
	47	+Delete as appropriate:
	48	+
	49	+* Goal 1: No poverty
	50	+* Goal 2: Zero hunger
	51	+* Goal 3: Good health and well-being
	52	+* Goal 4: Quality education
	53	+* Goal 5: Gender equality
	54	+* Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation
	55	+* Goal 7: Affordable and clean energy
	56	+* Goal 8: Decent work and economic growth
	57	+* Goal 9: Industry, innovation and infrastructure
59	59	* Goal 10: Reduced inequalities
	59	+* Goal 11: Sustainable cities and communities
	60	+* Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production
	61	+* Goal 13: Climate action
	62	+* Goal 14: Life below water
	63	+* Goal 15: Life on land
	64	+* Goal 16: Peace, justice and strong institutions
	65	+* Goal 17: Partnerships for the goals
60	60	)))
61	61	|(% style="width:211px" %)(((
62	62	====== **Required Data** ======
63	63	)))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
64		-* Broadband subscriptions
65		-* Density of discrete domain names and websites in communities
	70	+*
66	66	)))
67	67	|(% style="width:211px" %)(((
68	68	====== **Expected Outputs** ======
69	69	)))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
70		-* Correlation between economic deprivation indices and participation in digital technology
	75	+*
71	71	)))
72	72	|(% style="width:211px" %)(((
73	73	====== **Calculation methods** ======
74	74	)))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
75		-* Uptake of broadbands
76		-* Soioeconomic background on those who do not have broadband connection
77	77	*
78	78	)))
79	79	|(% style="width:211px" %)(((
80	80	====== **Level of expertise required** ======
81	81	)))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
82		-* High
	85	+*
83	83	)))
84	84	|(% style="width:211px" %)(((
85	85	====== **Links and references** ======
86	86	)))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
87		-* Seifert, A. and Rössel, J., 2021. Digital participation. In //Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging// (pp. 1446-1450). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
88		-* Hofmann, M., Münster, S. and Noennig, J.R., 2020. A theoretical framework for the evaluation of massive digital participation systems in urban planning. //Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis//, //4//(1), pp.1-12.
89		-* Morrison, C., 2016. Digital participation: a national framework for local action. Digital Scotland.
90		-* [[white_paper_vf-final-march2020.pdf (asu.edu)>>https://techdatasociety.asu.edu/sites/default/files/white_paper_vf-final-march2020.pdf]]
91	91	* Seele, P., Jia, C.D. and Helbing, D., 2019. The new silk road and its potential for sustainable development: how open digital participation could make BRI a role model for sustainable businesses and markets. //Asian journal of sustainability and social responsibility//, //4//(1), pp.1-7.
92	92	)))
93	93