Skip to Content
Version 4.1 by Emily West on 2022/03/04 10:40
Show last authors
1 = 1.2.4 Level of Digital Participation =
2
3 Project: U_CODE (Urban Collective Design Environment)
4
5 (% class="table-bordered" %)
6 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
7 ====== **Social challenge/ impact linked to:** ======
8 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)Social
9 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
10 ====== **Co-creation phase linked to:** ======
11 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
12 B) Define & co-designing    
13 )))
14 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
15 ====== **Level of importance** ======
16 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
17 **2** - Medium Importance / good to have
18 )))
19 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
20 ====== **Description** ======
21 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
22 Participation is important to ensure just and equal measures. Increasingly this must involve digital participation to allow the involvement of larger and more diverse actors in decision-making (Hofmann et al. 2020).  Several components are important for participation to be successful and fair:
23
24 * representativeness of 6+1 groups proportional to their
25 * Inclusiveness (the opportunity and ability of all participants to equally contribute)
26 * Internal transparency (at any time in the process it should be clear where the process is headed and what + why the next step is being taken)
27 * facilitation of deliberation (participants must understand each other and take on others' perspectives).
28
29
30 )))
31 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
32 ====== **Scale as linked to D2.2 framework** ======
33 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
34 Delete as appropriate:
35
36 * National
37 * City
38 * Neighborhood
39 * Project Area
40 * Street
41 * Household
42 * Object
43 )))
44 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
45 ====== **Data source and input type** ======
46 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
47 *
48 )))
49 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
50 ====== **Connection with SDGs** ======
51 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
52 * Goal 10: Reduced inequalities
53 )))
54 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
55 ====== **Required Data** ======
56 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
57 *
58 )))
59 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
60 ====== **Expected Outputs** ======
61 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
62 *
63 )))
64 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
65 ====== **Calculation methods** ======
66 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
67 *
68 )))
69 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
70 ====== **Level of expertise required** ======
71 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
72 *
73 )))
74 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
75 ====== **Links and references** ======
76 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
77 * Hofmann, M., Münster, S. and Noennig, J.R., 2020. A theoretical framework for the evaluation of massive digital participation systems in urban planning. //Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis//, //4//(1), pp.1-12.
78 * Seele, P., Jia, C.D. and Helbing, D., 2019. The new silk road and its potential for sustainable development: how open digital participation could make BRI a role model for sustainable businesses and markets. //Asian journal of sustainability and social responsibility//, //4//(1), pp.1-7.
79 )))
80
81 (% class="lead" %)
82 Revisions
83
84 (% class="success" %)|(% style="width:68px" %)**Version**|(% style="width:179px" %)**Name**|(% style="width:112px" %)**Date**|(% style="width:636px" %)**Changes made**
85 (% class="active" %)|(% style="width:68px" %)**0.1**|(% style="width:179px" %)Emily|(% style="width:112px" %)03/03/2022|(% style="width:636px" %)Factsheet created
86 (% class="active" %)|(% style="width:68px" %) |(% style="width:179px" %) |(% style="width:112px" %) |(% style="width:636px" %)
87
88