Version 5.1 by Emily West on 2022/03/04 10:40

Hide last authors
Emily West 1.1 1 = 1.2.4 Level of Digital Participation =
2
Emily West 5.1 3 New indicator
Emily West 3.1 4
Emily West 5.1 5 Linked to project: U_CODE (Urban Collective Design Environment)
6
Emily West 1.1 7 (% class="table-bordered" %)
8 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
9 ====== **Social challenge/ impact linked to:** ======
10 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)Social
11 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
12 ====== **Co-creation phase linked to:** ======
13 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
14 B) Define & co-designing    
15 )))
16 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
17 ====== **Level of importance** ======
18 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
19 **2** - Medium Importance / good to have
20 )))
21 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
22 ====== **Description** ======
Emily West 4.1 23 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
24 Participation is important to ensure just and equal measures. Increasingly this must involve digital participation to allow the involvement of larger and more diverse actors in decision-making (Hofmann et al. 2020).  Several components are important for participation to be successful and fair:
25
26 * representativeness of 6+1 groups proportional to their
27 * Inclusiveness (the opportunity and ability of all participants to equally contribute)
28 * Internal transparency (at any time in the process it should be clear where the process is headed and what + why the next step is being taken)
29 * facilitation of deliberation (participants must understand each other and take on others' perspectives).
30
31
32 )))
Emily West 1.1 33 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
34 ====== **Scale as linked to D2.2 framework** ======
35 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
36 Delete as appropriate:
37
38 * National
39 * City
40 * Neighborhood
41 * Project Area
42 * Street
43 * Household
44 * Object
45 )))
46 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
47 ====== **Data source and input type** ======
48 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
49 *
50 )))
51 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
52 ====== **Connection with SDGs** ======
53 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
54 * Goal 10: Reduced inequalities
55 )))
56 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
57 ====== **Required Data** ======
58 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
59 *
60 )))
61 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
62 ====== **Expected Outputs** ======
63 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
64 *
65 )))
66 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
67 ====== **Calculation methods** ======
68 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
69 *
70 )))
71 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
72 ====== **Level of expertise required** ======
73 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
74 *
75 )))
76 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
77 ====== **Links and references** ======
78 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
Emily West 3.1 79 * Hofmann, M., Münster, S. and Noennig, J.R., 2020. A theoretical framework for the evaluation of massive digital participation systems in urban planning. //Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis//, //4//(1), pp.1-12.
Emily West 1.1 80 * Seele, P., Jia, C.D. and Helbing, D., 2019. The new silk road and its potential for sustainable development: how open digital participation could make BRI a role model for sustainable businesses and markets. //Asian journal of sustainability and social responsibility//, //4//(1), pp.1-7.
81 )))
82
83 (% class="lead" %)
84 Revisions
85
86 (% class="success" %)|(% style="width:68px" %)**Version**|(% style="width:179px" %)**Name**|(% style="width:112px" %)**Date**|(% style="width:636px" %)**Changes made**
87 (% class="active" %)|(% style="width:68px" %)**0.1**|(% style="width:179px" %)Emily|(% style="width:112px" %)03/03/2022|(% style="width:636px" %)Factsheet created
88 (% class="active" %)|(% style="width:68px" %) |(% style="width:179px" %) |(% style="width:112px" %) |(% style="width:636px" %)
89
90