Skip to Content
Last modified by Hyunji Cho on 2022/05/23 12:31
Hide last authors
Emily West 2.1 1 = 1.2.2 Users and use of green spaces for diversity =
Hyunji Cho 1.1 2
3
4 |(((
5 ====== **Description** ======
6 )))|(((
7 This KPI measures the recreation opportunities available by urban green infrastructure.
8
9 This KPI aims to measure the increase of opportunities related to green infrastructures (Derkzen et al. 2015), being valued for recreation, social interaction, education and supporting healthy living (satisfaction).
10 )))
11 |(((
12 ====== **Scale as linked to D2.2 framework** ======
13 )))|(((
14 * City
15 * Neighborhood
16 )))
17 |(((
18 ====== **Data source [ link to data framework]** ======
19 )))|(((
Hyunji Cho 3.1 20 SURVEY, observation, or other participatory methods
21
Hyunji Cho 1.1 22 URBAN GreenUP approach:
23
Hyunji Cho 3.1 24 Focus group questionnaire
Hyunji Cho 1.1 25
26 Her City approach:
27
Hyunji Cho 3.1 28 Participant assessment by observing the local green spaces
Hyunji Cho 1.1 29 )))
30 |(((
31 ====== **Data needs** ======
32 )))|(((
33 URBAN GreenUP approach:
34
35 * Recreation opportunities scored by focus group
36 * The availability of recreation opportunities can be measured considering different elements: types of urban green infrastructure; degree of naturalness; aesthetics; scenic beauty; and presence of water. Users were asked to score these elements according to the relative importance. Scores were discussed during a focus group.
37
38 Her City approach:
39
Hyunji Cho 3.1 40 * Systematic observation with assessment form (very good-good-fair-poor-very poor) on the following section:
Hyunji Cho 1.1 41 * Number and variety of users accessing the public space
42 * Number and variety of activities observed in the public space among time and space
43
44 Additional data needs for DivAirCity:
45
46 * 6+1 information of assessors
47 )))
48 |(((
49 ====== **Expected Outputs** ======
50 )))|(((
51 * Level of uses and usability  of green spaces in the neighbourhood according to 6+1 groups
52 )))
53 |(((
54 ====== **Calculation methods** ======
55 )))|(((
56 URBAN GreenUP approach:
57
58 * Baseline and post-intervention measurements of user engagement with NBS through walking and cycling, types of activity undertaken in/with NBS (other than walking and cycling), frequency of interaction with NBS. Reported as frequency count data (interactions/week) (number of visitors, number of recreational activities) (Number of cultural events, people involved, and children in educational activities) value (Kabiisch and Haase 2014).
59 * Surface measurements shall be calculated with Geographical Information Systems (GIS). A Social Survey shall be calculated with the measurement of a questionnaire through standard software (Excel or SPSS).
60
61 Her City Approach:
62
63 * Average based on the 5 Likert scale assessments by participants
64 )))
65 |(((
66 ====== **Links and references** ======
67 )))|(((
Hyunji Cho 3.1 68 URBAN GreenUP Deliverable D2.4 - Monitoring program to Valladolid. https:~/~/www.urbangreenup.eu/insights/deliverables/d2-4~-~- -monitoring-program-to-valladolid.kl
69
70 URBAN GreenUP Deliverable D3.4 - Monitoring program to Liverpool https:~/~/www.urbangreenup.eu/insights/deliverables/d3-4~-~- -monitoring-program-to-liverpool.kl
71
72 URBAN GreenUP Deliverable D4.4 – Monitoring program to Izmir https:~/~/www.urbangreenup.eu/insights/deliverables/d4-4~-~- monitoring-program-to-izmir.kl
73
74 URBAN GreenUP Deliverable D5.3: City Diagnosis and Monitoring Procedures https:~/~/www.urbangreenup.eu/insights/deliverables/d5-3- city-diagnosis-and-monitoring-procedures.kl Questionnaires applied to the population for the recreational and cultural benefits of green spaces (Kabisch and Haase, 2014).
75
76 Derkzen, M.L., van Teeffelen, A.J.A., Verburg, P.H., 2015. Quantifying urban ecosystem services based on high resolution data of urban green space: An assessment for Rotterdam, the Netherlands. J. Appl. Ecol. 52, 1020–1032. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12469
77
78 QGIS 3 – Userguide. https:~/~/www.qgis.org/en/site/ QGIS Development Team 2013.
79
Hyunji Cho 4.1 80 QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation. URL [[http:~~/~~/qgis.osgeo.org>>http://qgis.osgeo.org]]
81
82 http:~/~/www.placemakingchicago.com/about/power.asp
83
84 https:~/~/gehlinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/QUALITY-CRITERIA-FINAL.pdf
85
86 https:~/~/gehlpeople.com/tools/twelve-quality-criteria/
Hyunji Cho 1.1 87 )))
88
89 Revisions
90
91 |**Version**|**Name**|**Date**|**Changes made**
92 |**0.1**|Hyunji(EcoWise)|11/02/2022|Factsheet created
93 | | | |
94
95