Skip to Content
Version 1.1 by Hyunji Cho on 2022/02/28 11:50
Hide last authors
Hyunji Cho 1.1 1 = 2.1.4 Residential Building quality & space =
2
3 |(((
4 ====== **Social challenge/ impact linked to:** ======
5 )))| Environmental
6 |(((
7 ====== **Co-creation phase linked to:** ======
8 )))|(((
9 A) Understanding & establishing co-creation  
10 )))
11 |(((
12 ====== **Level of importance** ======
13 )))|(((
14 **1** - High Importance / must have
15 )))
16 |(((
17 ====== **Description** ======
18 )))|(((
19 Degree to which buildings are designed to be environmentally friendly with respect to energy efficiency, water consumption, waste production, indoor environmental quality, and implementation of NBS (unitless value).
20
21 Environmental design is a broad concept concerning the structural, design and systemic features of buildings defining their impact on their environment. It is related to the concept of green buildings, which refers to environmentally sustainable design, construction, operation, maintenance and end of life of buildings.
22 )))
23 |(((
24 ====== **Scale as linked to D2.2 framework** ======
25 )))|(((
26
27
28 * City
29 * Neighborhood
30 )))
31 |(((
32 ====== **Data source and input type** ======
33 )))|(((
34 * Building energy efficiency
35 * Building location
36 )))
37 |(((
38 ====== **Connection with SDGs** ======
39 )))|(((
40
41
42 * Goal 11: Sustainable cities and communities
43 * Goal 13: Climate action
44 )))
45 |(((
46 ====== **Required Data** ======
47 )))|(((
48 * Energy efficiency
49 )))
50 |(((
51 ====== **Expected Outputs** ======
52 )))|(((
53 * Annual measurements
54 * The score of the energy efficiency
55 )))
56 |(((
57 ====== **Calculation methods** ======
58 )))|(((
59 * The area is divided into buildings, groups of buildings or blocks that represent similar building stock, as seen suitable. Each component is assessed on its environmental design considering incorporated environmental design considering parameters listed in Table 1. The building(s) being assessed are scored from 0 to 1 with respect to each parameter.
60 * Parameter: Energy efficiency
61 * Methods to consider (examples): Improved insultation/ Reflecting windows, Improved ventilation/ Heat excahngers in ventilation/Smart lighting, smart eletronics/ Renewable electricity (solar/wind)/ Heat pumps
62 * Scoring: 0 points: No design incorporated / 0.5 points: some measures taken / 1 point: Good measures taken
63 )))
64 |(((
65 ====== **Level of expertise required** ======
66 )))|(((
67 *
68 )))
69 |(((
70 ====== **Links and references** ======
71 )))|(((
72 * Doan, D. T., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Naismith, N., Zhang, T., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., & Tookey, J. (2017). A critical comparison of green building rating systems. Building and Environment, 123, 243–260.
73 * Sharifi, A., & Murayama, A. (2013). A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 38, 73–87.
74 * Sharifi, A., & Murayama, A. (2014). Neighborhood sustainability assessment in action: Cross-evaluation of three assessment systems and their cases from the US, the UK, and Japan. Building and Environment, 72, 243–258
75 )))
76
77 Revisions
78
79 |**Version**|**Name**|**Date**|**Changes made**
80 |**0.1**|Hyunji (EcoWise)|28/02/2022|Factsheet duplicated from Incorporation of environmental design in buildings
81 | | | |
82
83