Skip to Content
Last modified by Emily West on 2022/01/17 13:27
Show last authors
1 = 3.10.1 ESTIMAP nature-based recreation model =
2
3 From project: MAvES (Mapping, Assessment and Valuation of Ecosystems and their Services) (JRC-D3- Institutional project)
4
5 (% class="table-bordered" %)
6 |=(% style="width: 237px;" %)Pillar of Sustainable Development|=(% style="width: 646px;" %)Societal challenge
7 |(% style="width:237px" %)Planet|(% style="width:646px" %)1 - Climate Resilience
8
9 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
10 ====== **Description** ======
11 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
12 Capacity of ecosystems to provide opportunities for nature-based recreation activities.
13
14 Nature based recreation or “Physical and experiential interactions with natural environment” (CICES, https:~/~/cices.eu/) include a wide list of possible experience and activities such as Biking; boating; climbing; hiking; horseback riding, Walk the dog in a nice area; enjoy a local play ground; find an urban park nearby.
15
16 ESTIMAP (Ecosystem Services Mapping Tool) nature-based recreation model was developed to map recreation opportunities at European scale. It is an ‘Advanced multiple layer LookUp Tables” model which measures the capacity of ecosystems to provide nature-based recreational and leisure opportunities. It is a “context based indicator”, to create hot spot maps for recreation activities and, simultaneously represent their territorial context.
17
18 The original model (Zulian et al. 2013b; Paracchini et al. 2014; Liquete et al. 2016; Vallecillo et al. 2019), up to now applied at European scale was adapted to fit the urban setting. In previous applications the approach was used in urban context (Zulian et al. 2017), but only with reference to specific local applications, such as in Barcelona (Baró et al. 2016) or Trento (Cortinovis et al. 2018).
19
20 Urban ESTIMAP-recreation consists of four basic sections:
21
22 * (1) The Recreation Potential (RP), which estimates the potential capacity of ecosystems to support nature-based recreational activities based on land suitability for recreation and the natural, infrastructure and water features influence recreational opportunity provision;
23 * (2) The Opportunity map (OS), which expresses the presence of facilities to enjoy and reach areas with potential opportunities. (
24 * 3) The Recreation Opportunity Spectrum map (ROS), which combines the Opportunity map (OS) and the Recreation Potential (RP).
25 * (4) A potential accessibility map which represent the cumulative potential visitors based on a fuction of the distance and the total opportunities available within a defined distance.
26 )))
27 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
28 ====== **Scale as linked to D2.2 framework** ======
29 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
30 Delete as appropriate:
31
32 * National
33 * City
34 * Neighborhood
35 * Street
36 * Household
37 * Object
38 )))
39 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
40 ====== **Data source [ link to data framework]** ======
41 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
42 * Satellite
43 )))
44 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
45 ====== **Data needs** ======
46 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
47 (% class="table-bordered" %)
48 |(% style="width:64px" %)Data (version)|(% style="width:60px" %)Data holder|(% style="width:115px" %)Spatial resolution|(% style="width:318px" %)website
49 |(% style="width:64px" %)Corine Land Cover|(% style="width:60px" %)EEA|(% style="width:115px" %)100 m|(% style="width:318px" %)[[https:~~/~~/land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover>>https://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover]]
50 |(% style="width:64px" %)CDDA|(% style="width:60px" %)EEA|(% style="width:115px" %)vector|(% style="width:318px" %)[[https:~~/~~/www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/nationally-designated-areas-national-cdda-12/gis-data/cdda-shape-file>>https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/nationally-designated-areas-national-cdda-12/gis-data/cdda-shape-file]]
51 |(% style="width:64px" %)Natura 2000|(% style="width:60px" %) |(% style="width:115px" %) |(% style="width:318px" %)[[https:~~/~~/www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/natura-5>>https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/natura-5]]
52 |(% style="width:64px" %)Bathing water quality|(% style="width:60px" %)EEA|(% style="width:115px" %)vector|(% style="width:318px" %)[[https:~~/~~/www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/bathing-water-directive-status-of-bathing-water-11>>https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/bathing-water-directive-status-of-bathing-water-11]]
53 |(% style="width:64px" %)Coast geomorphol ogy|(% style="width:60px" %)EEA|(% style="width:115px" %)1:100 000|(% style="width:318px" %)(((
54 [[http:~~/~~/www.eurosion.org/>>http://www.eurosion.org/]]
55
56 CDDA[[http:~~/~~/www.eea.europa.eu/>>http://www.eea.europa.eu/]]
57 )))
58 |(% style="width:64px" %)Urban greenness|(% style="width:60px" %)Earth Engine's public data catalog|(% style="width:115px" %)30 m|(% style="width:318px" %)(((
59 https:~/~/developers.google.com/earth engine/datasets/catalog/
60
61 LANDSAT_LE07_C01_T1 _ANNUAL_GREENEST_TOA
62 )))
63 |(% style="width:64px" %)Open Street Map|(% style="width:60px" %)OpenStreet Map contributors. (2015)|(% style="width:115px" %)vector|(% style="width:318px" %)" Planet dump [Data file from: 25/06/2019$]. Retrieved from https:~/~/planet.openstreetmap.org."
64 |(% style="width:64px" %)Population data|(% style="width:60px" %)GHSL|(% style="width:115px" %)250 m|(% style="width:318px" %)[[https:~~/~~/data.jrc.ec.europa.eu/dataset/42e8be89-54ff-464e-be7b-bf9e64da5218>>https://data.jrc.ec.europa.eu/dataset/42e8be89-54ff-464e-be7b-bf9e64da5218]]
65 )))
66 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
67 ====== **Expected Outputs** ======
68 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
69 * Year or time-series range (for available data at EU scale): 2000 2012 2018
70 * 100m
71 )))
72 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
73 ====== **Calculation methods** ======
74 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
75 * To be determined
76 )))
77 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
78 ====== **Links and references** ======
79 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
80 * Baró F, Palomo I, Zulian G, Vizcaino P, Haase D, Gómez-Baggethun E (2016) Mapping ecosystem service capacity, flow and demand for landscape and urban planning: A case study in the Barcelona metropolitan region. Land use policy. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.006
81 * Cortinovis C, Zulian G, Geneletti D (2018) Assessing Nature-Based Recreation to Support Urban Green Infrastructure Planning in Trento (Italy). Land 7(4): 112. doi: 10.3390/land7040112
82 * Liquete C, Piroddi C, Macías D, Druon J-N, Zulian G (2016) Ecosystem services sustainability in the Mediterranean Sea: Assessment of status and trends using multiple modelling approaches. Sci Rep. doi: 10.1038/srep34162
83 * Maes J, Zulian G, Günther S, Thijssen M, Reynal J (2019) Enhancing Resilience Of Urban Ecosystems through Green Infrastructure ( EnRoute ) Final Report. Luxembourg.
84 * Paracchini ML, Zulian G, Kopperoinen L, Maes J, Schägner JP, Termansen M, Zandersen M, Perez-Soba M, Scholefield PA, Bidoglio G (2014) Mapping cultural ecosystem services: A framework to assess the potential for outdoor recreation across the EU. Ecol Indic 45: 371–385. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.018
85 * Vallecillo S, La Notte A, Zulian G, Ferrini S, Maes J (2019) Ecosystem services accounts: Valuing the actual flow of nature-based recreation from ecosystems to people. Ecol Modell 392(April 2018): 196–211. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.09.023
86 * Zulian G, Paracchini M-L, Maes J, Liquete Garcia MDC (2013) ESTIMAP: Ecosystem services mapping at European scale. European Commision
87 * Zulian G, Stange E, Woods H, Carvalho L, Dick J, Andrews C, Baró F, Vizcaino P, Barton DN, Nowel M, Rusch GM, Autunes P, Fernandes J, Ferraz D, Ferreira dos Santos R, Aszalós R, Arany I, Czúcz B, et al (2017) Practical application of spatial ecosystem service models to aid decision support. Ecosyst Serv. doi: https:~/~/doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.005
88 )))
89
90 (% class="lead" %)
91 Revisions
92
93 (% class="success" %)|(% style="width:68px" %)**Version**|(% style="width:179px" %)**Name**|(% style="width:112px" %)**Date**|(% style="width:636px" %)**Changes made**
94 (% class="active" %)|(% style="width:68px" %)**0.1**|(% style="width:179px" %)Emily (EcoWise)|(% style="width:112px" %)17/01/2022|(% style="width:636px" %)Factsheet created
95 (% class="active" %)|(% style="width:68px" %) |(% style="width:179px" %) |(% style="width:112px" %) |(% style="width:636px" %)
96
97