Wiki source code of 3.10 Recreational opportunities provided by green infrastructure
Last modified by Emily West on 2022/01/17 13:11
Hide last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
 |
1.1 | 1 | = 3.10 Recreational opportunities provided by green infrastructure = |
| 2 | |||
| 3 | From Project: URBAN GreenUP | ||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | (% class="table-bordered" %) | ||
| 6 | |=(% style="width: 237px;" %)Pillar of Sustainable Development|=(% style="width: 646px;" %)Societal challenge | ||
| 7 | |(% style="width:237px" %)Planet|(% style="width:646px" %)3 - Green Space Management | ||
| 8 | |||
| 9 | (% class="table-bordered" %) | ||
| 10 | |(% style="width:211px" %)((( | ||
| 11 | ====== **Description** ====== | ||
| 12 | )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( | ||
| 13 | This KPI measures the recreation opportunities available by urban green infrastructure. | ||
| 14 | |||
| 15 | This KPI aims to measure the increase of opportunities related to green infrastructures (Derkzen et al. 2015), being valued for recreation, social interaction, education and supporting healthy living (satisfaction). | ||
| 16 | ))) | ||
| 17 | |(% style="width:211px" %)((( | ||
| 18 | ====== **Scale as linked to D2.2 framework** ====== | ||
| 19 | )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( | ||
| 20 | * City | ||
| 21 | * Neighborhood | ||
| 22 | ))) | ||
| 23 | |(% style="width:211px" %)((( | ||
| 24 | ====== **Data source [ link to data framework]** ====== | ||
| 25 | )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( | ||
| 26 | * Focus group questionnaire | ||
| 27 | ))) | ||
| 28 | |(% style="width:211px" %)((( | ||
| 29 | ====== **Data needs** ====== | ||
| 30 | )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( | ||
| 31 | * Recreation opportunities scored by focus group | ||
| 32 | ))) | ||
| 33 | |(% style="width:211px" %)((( | ||
| 34 | ====== **Expected Outputs** ====== | ||
| 35 | )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( | ||
| 36 | * The availability of recreation opportunities can be measured considering different elements: types of urban green infrastructure; degree of naturalness; aesthetics; scenic beauty; and presence of water. Users were asked to score these elements according to the relative importance. Scores were discussed during a focus group. | ||
| 37 | ))) | ||
| 38 | |(% style="width:211px" %)((( | ||
| 39 | ====== **Calculation methods** ====== | ||
| 40 | )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( | ||
| 41 | * Baseline and post-intervention measurements of user engagement with NBS through walking and cycling, types of activity undertaken in/with NBS (other than walking and cycling), frequency of interaction with NBS. Reported as frequency count data (interactions/week) (number of visitors, number of recreational activities) (Number of cultural events, people involved, and children in educational activities) value (Kabiisch and Haase 2014). | ||
| 42 | * Surface measurements shall be calculated with Geographical Information Systems (GIS). A Social Survey shall be calculated with the measurement of a questionnaire through standard software (Excel or SPSS). | ||
| 43 | ))) | ||
| 44 | |(% style="width:211px" %)((( | ||
| 45 | ====== **Links and references** ====== | ||
| 46 | )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( | ||
| 47 | * URBAN GreenUP Deliverable D2.4 - Monitoring program to Valladolid. https:~/~/www.urbangreenup.eu/insights/deliverables/d2-4~-~- -monitoring-program-to-valladolid.kl | ||
| 48 | * URBAN GreenUP Deliverable D3.4 - Monitoring program to Liverpool https:~/~/www.urbangreenup.eu/insights/deliverables/d3-4~-~- -monitoring-program-to-liverpool.kl | ||
| 49 | * URBAN GreenUP Deliverable D4.4 – Monitoring program to Izmir https:~/~/www.urbangreenup.eu/insights/deliverables/d4-4~-~- monitoring-program-to-izmir.kl | ||
| 50 | * URBAN GreenUP Deliverable D5.3: City Diagnosis and Monitoring Procedures https:~/~/www.urbangreenup.eu/insights/deliverables/d5-3- city-diagnosis-and-monitoring-procedures.kl Questionnaires applied to the population for the recreational and cultural benefits of green spaces (Kabisch and Haase, 2014). | ||
| 51 | * Derkzen, M.L., van Teeffelen, A.J.A., Verburg, P.H., 2015. Quantifying urban ecosystem services based on high resolution data of urban green space: An assessment for Rotterdam, the Netherlands. J. Appl. Ecol. 52, 1020–1032. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12469 | ||
| 52 | * QGIS 3 – Userguide. https:~/~/www.qgis.org/en/site/ QGIS Development Team 2013. | ||
| 53 | * QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation. URL http:~/~/qgis.osgeo.org | ||
| 54 | ))) | ||
| 55 | |||
| 56 | (% class="lead" %) | ||
| 57 | Revisions | ||
| 58 | |||
| 59 | (% class="success" %)|(% style="width:68px" %)**Version**|(% style="width:179px" %)**Name**|(% style="width:112px" %)**Date**|(% style="width:636px" %)**Changes made** | ||
| 60 | (% class="active" %)|(% style="width:68px" %)**0.1**|(% style="width:179px" %)Emily (EcoWise)|(% style="width:112px" %)17/01/2022|(% style="width:636px" %)Factsheet created | ||
| 61 | (% class="active" %)|(% style="width:68px" %) |(% style="width:179px" %) |(% style="width:112px" %) |(% style="width:636px" %) | ||
| 62 | |||
| 63 |