Wiki source code of 3.6 Diversity of green space

Last modified by Emily West on 2022/01/14 16:44

Hide last authors
Emily West 2.1 1 = 3.6 Diversity of green space =
2
3 From project: Nature4Cities
4
5 (% class="table-bordered" %)
6 |=(% style="width: 237px;" %)Pillar of Sustainable Development|=(% style="width: 646px;" %)Societal challenge
7 |(% style="width:237px" %)Planet|(% style="width:646px" %)3 - Green Space Management
8
9 (% class="table-bordered" %)
10 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
11 ====== **Description** ======
12 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)Indicates the proportion of bare turf and sparse vegetation, grassland and herbs, shrubs, trees and of built environment to the total area.
13 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
14 ====== **Scale as linked to D2.2 framework** ======
15 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
16 * Neighborhood
17 * Street
18 * Household
19 * Object
20 )))
21 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
22 ====== **Data source [ link to data framework]** ======
23 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
24 * Field data
25 * or satellite imagery
26 )))
27 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
28 ====== **Data needs** ======
29 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
30 * Proportion of each class of habitat
31 )))
32 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
33 ====== **Expected Outputs** ======
34 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
35 * Mapping is possible
36 )))
37 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
38 ====== **Calculation methods** ======
39 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
40 * spreadsheet methods
41 * or GIS-based models (spatial resolution of 1 meter)
42 * calculation method:
43 * [[image:1642178070561-545.png]]
44 * Where pi corresponds to the proportion of each of the five kind of habitat
45 )))
46 |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
47 ====== **Links and references** ======
48 )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
49 * Cornelis, Johnny, and Martin Hermy. “Biodiversity Relationships in Urban and Suburban Parks in Flanders.” Landscape and Urban Planning 69, no. 4 (October 30, 2004): 385–401. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.038.
50 * Nagendra, H. (2002). Opposite trends in response for the Shannon and Simpson indices of landscape diversity. Applied Geography, 22(2), 175-186.
51 * Whitford, V., A. R. Ennos, and J. F. Handley. “‘City Form and Natural Process’—indicators for the Ecological Performance of Urban Areas and Their Application to Merseyside, UK.” Landscape and Urban Planning 57, no. 2 (November 20, 2001): 91–103. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00192-X
52 * Nature4Cities, D2.1 - System of integrated multi-scale and multi thematic performance indicators for the assessment of urban challenges and NBS. https:~/~/www.nature4cities.eu/post/nature4cities-defined performance-indicators-to-assess-urban-challenges-and nature-based-solutions. -
53 * Nature4Cities, D2.2 - Expert-modelling toolbox
54 * Nature4Cities, D2.3 – NBS database completed with urban performance data https:~/~/www.nature4cities.eu/post/applicability-urban-challenges and-indicators-real-case-studies
55 * Nature4Cities, D2.4 - Development of a simplified urban performance assessment (SUA) tool
56 )))
57
58 (% class="lead" %)
59 Revisions
60
61 (% class="success" %)|(% style="width:68px" %)**Version**|(% style="width:179px" %)**Name**|(% style="width:112px" %)**Date**|(% style="width:636px" %)**Changes made**
62 (% class="active" %)|(% style="width:68px" %)**0.1**|(% style="width:179px" %)Emily (EcoWise)|(% style="width:112px" %)14/01/2022|(% style="width:636px" %)Factsheet created
63 (% class="active" %)|(% style="width:68px" %) |(% style="width:179px" %) |(% style="width:112px" %) |(% style="width:636px" %)
64
65