Skip to Content

Changes for page 5.3.1.5. Political voice

Last modified by Hyunji Cho on 2022/02/04 10:11
From version 1.4
edited by Hyunji Cho
on 2022/01/11 13:58
Change comment: Update document after refactoring.
To version 3.1
edited by Hyunji Cho
on 2022/02/04 10:11
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -5.3.1.6. Governance
1 +5.3.1.5. Political voice
Content
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,74 @@
1 += 5.3.1.5. Political voice =
2 +
3 +|(((
4 +====== **Social challenge/ impact linked to:** ======
5 +)))|Social
6 +|(((
7 +====== **Level of importance** ======
8 +)))|(((
9 +
10 +
11 +**2** - Medium Importance / good to have
12 +
13 +
14 +)))
15 +|(((
16 +====== **Description** ======
17 +)))|Based upon government submissions to the Rio+20 process, Voice was proposed as a domain in the original Doughnut model. This was focused upon measuring freedom of political expression and participation. Citizenship and Community were suggested as alternatives during the Oxfam workshop in November 2012, alongside the inclusion of Governance. We propose here to draw out a common element of all these domains that seeks to assess the impact that citizens can have on their political systems and the decisions made within them. For the sake of consistent terminology, we have labelled this domain Governance.
18 +|(((
19 +====== **Scale as linked to D2.2 framework** ======
20 +)))|(((
21 +
22 +
23 +* City
24 +)))
25 +|(((
26 +====== **Data source and input type** ======
27 +)))|(((
28 +* Official survey (The British Social Attitudes Survey )
29 +* Election data
30 +)))
31 +|(((
32 +====== **Connection with SDGs** ======
33 +)))|(((
34 +
35 +
36 +* Goal 16: Peace, justice and strong institutions
37 +* Goal 17: Partnerships for the goals
38 +)))
39 +|(((
40 +====== **Required Data** ======
41 +)))|(((
42 +* Personal political efficacy
43 +* Voter turnout
44 +)))
45 +|(((
46 +====== **Expected Outputs** ======
47 +)))|(((
48 +* % of voter turn out
49 +* % of the population who responded negatively in surveys (e.g. 'people like me have no say in what government does') 
50 +)))
51 +|(((
52 +====== **Calculation methods** ======
53 +)))|(((
54 +* % of voter turn out compared overall population
55 +)))
56 +|(((
57 +====== **Level of expertise required** ======
58 +)))|(((
59 +* low
60 +)))
61 +|(((
62 +====== **Links and references** ======
63 +)))|(((
64 +* [[https:~~/~~/policy-practice.oxfam.org/resources/the-uk-doughnut-a-framework-for-environmental-sustainability-and-social-justice-344550/>>https://policy-practice.oxfam.org/resources/the-uk-doughnut-a-framework-for-environmental-sustainability-and-social-justice-344550/]]
65 +* [[https:~~/~~/doughnuteconomics.org/stories/1>>https://doughnuteconomics.org/stories/1]]
66 +)))
67 +
68 +Revisions
69 +
70 +|**Version**|**Name**|**Date**|**Changes made**
71 +|**0.1**| | |Factsheet created
72 +| | | |
73 +
74 +