Changes for page 5.3.1.5. Political voice
Last modified by Hyunji Cho on 2022/02/04 10:11
From version 2.1
edited by Hyunji Cho
on 2022/02/04 08:41
on 2022/02/04 08:41
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 3.1
edited by Hyunji Cho
on 2022/02/04 10:11
on 2022/02/04 10:11
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,74 @@ 1 += 5.3.1.5. Political voice = 2 + 3 +|((( 4 +====== **Social challenge/ impact linked to:** ====== 5 +)))|Social 6 +|((( 7 +====== **Level of importance** ====== 8 +)))|((( 9 + 10 + 11 +**2** - Medium Importance / good to have 12 + 13 + 14 +))) 15 +|((( 16 +====== **Description** ====== 17 +)))|Based upon government submissions to the Rio+20 process, Voice was proposed as a domain in the original Doughnut model. This was focused upon measuring freedom of political expression and participation. Citizenship and Community were suggested as alternatives during the Oxfam workshop in November 2012, alongside the inclusion of Governance. We propose here to draw out a common element of all these domains that seeks to assess the impact that citizens can have on their political systems and the decisions made within them. For the sake of consistent terminology, we have labelled this domain Governance. 18 +|((( 19 +====== **Scale as linked to D2.2 framework** ====== 20 +)))|((( 21 + 22 + 23 +* City 24 +))) 25 +|((( 26 +====== **Data source and input type** ====== 27 +)))|((( 28 +* Official survey (The British Social Attitudes Survey ) 29 +* Election data 30 +))) 31 +|((( 32 +====== **Connection with SDGs** ====== 33 +)))|((( 34 + 35 + 36 +* Goal 16: Peace, justice and strong institutions 37 +* Goal 17: Partnerships for the goals 38 +))) 39 +|((( 40 +====== **Required Data** ====== 41 +)))|((( 42 +* Personal political efficacy 43 +* Voter turnout 44 +))) 45 +|((( 46 +====== **Expected Outputs** ====== 47 +)))|((( 48 +* % of voter turn out 49 +* % of the population who responded negatively in surveys (e.g. 'people like me have no say in what government does') 50 +))) 51 +|((( 52 +====== **Calculation methods** ====== 53 +)))|((( 54 +* % of voter turn out compared overall population 55 +))) 56 +|((( 57 +====== **Level of expertise required** ====== 58 +)))|((( 59 +* low 60 +))) 61 +|((( 62 +====== **Links and references** ====== 63 +)))|((( 64 +* [[https:~~/~~/policy-practice.oxfam.org/resources/the-uk-doughnut-a-framework-for-environmental-sustainability-and-social-justice-344550/>>https://policy-practice.oxfam.org/resources/the-uk-doughnut-a-framework-for-environmental-sustainability-and-social-justice-344550/]] 65 +* [[https:~~/~~/doughnuteconomics.org/stories/1>>https://doughnuteconomics.org/stories/1]] 66 +))) 67 + 68 +Revisions 69 + 70 +|**Version**|**Name**|**Date**|**Changes made** 71 +|**0.1**| | |Factsheet created 72 +| | | | 73 + 74 +