Wiki source code of 5.3.1.5. Political voice
Last modified by Hyunji Cho on 2022/02/04 10:11
Hide last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
 |
3.1 | 1 | = 5.3.1.5. Political voice = |
| 2 | |||
| 3 | |((( | ||
| 4 | ====== **Social challenge/ impact linked to:** ====== | ||
| 5 | )))|Social | ||
| 6 | |((( | ||
| 7 | ====== **Level of importance** ====== | ||
| 8 | )))|((( | ||
| 9 | |||
| 10 | |||
| 11 | **2** - Medium Importance / good to have | ||
| 12 | |||
| 13 | |||
| 14 | ))) | ||
| 15 | |((( | ||
| 16 | ====== **Description** ====== | ||
| 17 | )))|Based upon government submissions to the Rio+20 process, Voice was proposed as a domain in the original Doughnut model. This was focused upon measuring freedom of political expression and participation. Citizenship and Community were suggested as alternatives during the Oxfam workshop in November 2012, alongside the inclusion of Governance. We propose here to draw out a common element of all these domains that seeks to assess the impact that citizens can have on their political systems and the decisions made within them. For the sake of consistent terminology, we have labelled this domain Governance. | ||
| 18 | |((( | ||
| 19 | ====== **Scale as linked to D2.2 framework** ====== | ||
| 20 | )))|((( | ||
| 21 | |||
| 22 | |||
| 23 | * City | ||
| 24 | ))) | ||
| 25 | |((( | ||
| 26 | ====== **Data source and input type** ====== | ||
| 27 | )))|((( | ||
| 28 | * Official survey (The British Social Attitudes Survey ) | ||
| 29 | * Election data | ||
| 30 | ))) | ||
| 31 | |((( | ||
| 32 | ====== **Connection with SDGs** ====== | ||
| 33 | )))|((( | ||
| 34 | |||
| 35 | |||
| 36 | * Goal 16: Peace, justice and strong institutions | ||
| 37 | * Goal 17: Partnerships for the goals | ||
| 38 | ))) | ||
| 39 | |((( | ||
| 40 | ====== **Required Data** ====== | ||
| 41 | )))|((( | ||
| 42 | * Personal political efficacy | ||
| 43 | * Voter turnout | ||
| 44 | ))) | ||
| 45 | |((( | ||
| 46 | ====== **Expected Outputs** ====== | ||
| 47 | )))|((( | ||
| 48 | * % of voter turn out | ||
| 49 | * % of the population who responded negatively in surveys (e.g. 'people like me have no say in what government does') | ||
| 50 | ))) | ||
| 51 | |((( | ||
| 52 | ====== **Calculation methods** ====== | ||
| 53 | )))|((( | ||
| 54 | * % of voter turn out compared overall population | ||
| 55 | ))) | ||
| 56 | |((( | ||
| 57 | ====== **Level of expertise required** ====== | ||
| 58 | )))|((( | ||
| 59 | * low | ||
| 60 | ))) | ||
| 61 | |((( | ||
| 62 | ====== **Links and references** ====== | ||
| 63 | )))|((( | ||
| 64 | * [[https:~~/~~/policy-practice.oxfam.org/resources/the-uk-doughnut-a-framework-for-environmental-sustainability-and-social-justice-344550/>>https://policy-practice.oxfam.org/resources/the-uk-doughnut-a-framework-for-environmental-sustainability-and-social-justice-344550/]] | ||
| 65 | * [[https:~~/~~/doughnuteconomics.org/stories/1>>https://doughnuteconomics.org/stories/1]] | ||
| 66 | ))) | ||
| 67 | |||
| 68 | Revisions | ||
| 69 | |||
| 70 | |**Version**|**Name**|**Date**|**Changes made** | ||
| 71 | |**0.1**| | |Factsheet created | ||
| 72 | | | | | | ||
| 73 | |||
| 74 |
