Skip to Content

Changes for page 5.3.1.3: Income & work

Last modified by Hyunji Cho on 2022/02/02 13:35
From version 3.1
edited by Hyunji Cho
on 2022/02/02 13:35
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 1.1
edited by Hyunji Cho
on 2022/01/11 10:30
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -5.3.1.3: Income & work
1 +5.3.8: Income
Parent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -5\. Metrics and KPIs.5\.3\: External References - UK Doughnut Model Indicators.5\.3\.1\. Social Foundation.WebHome
1 +5\. Metrics and KPIs.5\.3\: External References - UK Doughnut Model Indicators.WebHome
Content
... ... @@ -1,100 +1,0 @@
1 -= 5.3.1.3: Income & work =
2 -
3 -|(((
4 -====== **Social challenge/ impact linked to:** ======
5 -)))|Social / Economic
6 -|(((
7 -====== **Level of importance** ======
8 -)))|(((
9 -
10 -
11 -**1** - High Importance / must have
12 -)))
13 -|(((
14 -====== **Description** ======
15 -)))|(((
16 -Monetary income is vital in a developed market economy where access to various aspects of life is largely determined by financial resources (either directly or indirectly). This was clearly identified as fundamental in the Oxfam workshop, as well as through secondary sources and discussions with stakeholders.
17 -
18 -As well as providing some level of income, there is significant evidence that work is central to people’s physical, emotional and mental health, and should therefore be included in the Doughnut model. The quality of work – not just its remuneration – impacts on people’s ability to maintain good mental health and to engage in non-work activities in the community and with family. This is made clear in the Humankind Index, which identified satisfying, secure and suitable work that pays an adequate income as central.
19 -)))
20 -|(((
21 -====== **Scale as linked to D2.2 framework** ======
22 -)))|(((
23 -
24 -
25 -* City
26 -* Neighborhood
27 -)))
28 -|(((
29 -====== **Data source and input type** ======
30 -)))|(((
31 -* self-reported satisfaction levels (UK example: from UK Household Longitudinal Survey  and d the Workplace Employment Relations Study
32 -)))
33 -|(((
34 -====== **Connection with SDGs** ======
35 -)))|(((
36 -
37 -
38 -* Goal 1: No poverty
39 -* Goal 2: Zero hunger
40 -* Goal 8: Decent work and economic growth
41 -* Goal 5: Gender equality
42 -* Goal 10: Reduced inequalities
43 -)))
44 -|(((
45 -====== **Required Data** ======
46 -)))|(((
47 -Work
48 -
49 -* percent of employed people in the UK are somewhat, mostly or completely dissatisfied with their work
50 -* unemployment
51 -
52 -Income
53 -
54 -* Households income
55 -* Households composition (e.g. lone parents, gender of lone parents)
56 -)))
57 -|(((
58 -====== **Expected Outputs** ======
59 -)))|(((
60 -Work
61 -
62 -* Percentage lacking satisfying work
63 -
64 -Income
65 -
66 -* MIS, HBAI, AHC
67 -* Gender inequality through the lone parent household income and gender of lone parents
68 -)))
69 -|(((
70 -====== **Calculation methods** ======
71 -)))|(((
72 -Work
73 -
74 -* Economically active population :  (employed + unemployed but seeking work) 
75 -* Percentage lacking satisfying work: (number from official survey / economically active population)*100
76 -
77 -Income
78 -
79 -* a relative measure set at 60 percent below the median household income,   calculated after housing costs have been deducted to allow for a truer assessment of disposable income  (HBAI, AHC)
80 -* the Minimum Income Standard (MIS)
81 -*
82 -)))
83 -|(((
84 -====== **Level of expertise required** ======
85 -)))|(((
86 -*
87 -)))
88 -|(((
89 -====== **Links and references** ======
90 -)))|(((
91 -* the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) and the Centre for Research in Social Policy at Loughborough University
92 -)))
93 -
94 -Revisions
95 -
96 -|**Version**|**Name**|**Date**|**Changes made**
97 -|**0.1**| | |Factsheet created
98 -| | | |
99 -
100 -