Changes for page 5.3.1.3: Income & work
Last modified by Hyunji Cho on 2022/02/02 13:35
From version 3.1
edited by Hyunji Cho
on 2022/02/02 13:35
on 2022/02/02 13:35
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 2.1
edited by Hyunji Cho
on 2022/02/02 11:16
on 2022/02/02 11:16
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -6,78 +6,52 @@ 6 6 |((( 7 7 ====== **Level of importance** ====== 8 8 )))|((( 9 - 9 +Delete as appropriate: 10 10 11 11 **1** - High Importance / must have 12 + 13 +**2** - Medium Importance / good to have 14 + 15 +**3** - Low importance / Not needed 12 12 ))) 13 13 |((( 14 14 ====== **Description** ====== 15 -)))|((( 16 -Monetary income is vital in a developed market economy where access to various aspects of life is largely determined by financial resources (either directly or indirectly). This was clearly identified as fundamental in the Oxfam workshop, as well as through secondary sources and discussions with stakeholders. 17 - 18 -As well as providing some level of income, there is significant evidence that work is central to people’s physical, emotional and mental health, and should therefore be included in the Doughnut model. The quality of work – not just its remuneration – impacts on people’s ability to maintain good mental health and to engage in non-work activities in the community and with family. This is made clear in the Humankind Index, which identified satisfying, secure and suitable work that pays an adequate income as central. 19 -))) 19 +)))| 20 20 |((( 21 21 ====== **Scale as linked to D2.2 framework** ====== 22 22 )))|((( 23 - 23 +Delete as appropriate: 24 24 25 +* National 25 25 * City 26 26 * Neighborhood 28 +* Street 29 +* Household 30 +* Object 27 27 ))) 28 28 |((( 29 29 ====== **Data source and input type** ====== 30 30 )))|((( 31 -* self-reportedsatisfaction levels (UK example: from UK Household Longitudinal Survey and d the Workplace Employment Relations Study35 +* 32 32 ))) 33 33 |((( 34 34 ====== **Connection with SDGs** ====== 35 35 )))|((( 36 - 37 - 38 -* Goal 1: No poverty 39 -* Goal 2: Zero hunger 40 -* Goal 8: Decent work and economic growth 41 -* Goal 5: Gender equality 42 -* Goal 10: Reduced inequalities 40 +* 43 43 ))) 44 44 |((( 45 45 ====== **Required Data** ====== 46 46 )))|((( 47 -Work 48 - 49 -* percent of employed people in the UK are somewhat, mostly or completely dissatisfied with their work 50 -* unemployment 51 - 52 -Income 53 - 54 -* Households income 55 -* Households composition (e.g. lone parents, gender of lone parents) 45 +* 56 56 ))) 57 57 |((( 58 58 ====== **Expected Outputs** ====== 59 59 )))|((( 60 -Work 61 - 62 -* Percentage lacking satisfying work 63 - 64 -Income 65 - 66 -* MIS, HBAI, AHC 67 -* Gender inequality through the lone parent household income and gender of lone parents 50 +* 68 68 ))) 69 69 |((( 70 70 ====== **Calculation methods** ====== 71 71 )))|((( 72 -Work 73 - 74 -* Economically active population : (employed + unemployed but seeking work) 75 -* Percentage lacking satisfying work: (number from official survey / economically active population)*100 76 - 77 -Income 78 - 79 -* a relative measure set at 60 percent below the median household income, calculated after housing costs have been deducted to allow for a truer assessment of disposable income (HBAI, AHC) 80 -* the Minimum Income Standard (MIS) 81 81 * 82 82 ))) 83 83 |((( ... ... @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ 88 88 |((( 89 89 ====== **Links and references** ====== 90 90 )))|((( 91 -* the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) and the Centre for Research in Social Policy at Loughborough University65 +* 92 92 ))) 93 93 94 94 Revisions