Skip to Content
Last modified by Emily West on 2022/02/28 10:44
From version 4.3
edited by Emre Yontem
on 2022/01/10 15:21
Change comment: Update document after refactoring.
To version 1.1
edited by Emily West
on 2022/01/05 14:07
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Parent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -5\. Metrics and KPIs.5\.1\: DivAirCity Indicators.5\.1\.2\. Climate Mitigation Indicators.WebHome
1 +Metric and Key Performance Indicators.WebHome
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.admin
1 +XWiki.emilywest
Content
... ... @@ -34,11 +34,9 @@
34 34  * Data on global, regional and national fossil fuel CO2 emissions from the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center at Oak Ridge National Laboratory
35 35  )))
36 36  |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
37 -===== **Data Needs** =====
37 +===== **Needs** =====
38 38  )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
39 -* CO2-equivalent emission is the amount of CO2 emission that would cause the same time-integrated radiative forcing, over a given time horizon, as an emitted amount of a long-lived GHG or a mixture of GHGs.
40 -* The equivalent CO2 emission is obtained by multiplying the emission of a GHG by its Global Warming Potential (GWP) for the given time horizon. For a mix of GHGs, it is obtained by combining the equivalent CO2 emissions of each gas.
41 -* Equivalent CO2 emission is a standard and useful metric for comparing emissions of different GHGs but does not imply the same climate change responses.
39 +* CO2-equivalent emission is the amount of CO2 emission that would cause the same time-integrated radiative forcing, over a given time horizon, as an emitted amount of a long-lived GHG or a mixture of GHGs. The equivalent CO2 emission is obtained by multiplying the emission of a GHG by its Global Warming Potential (GWP) for the given time horizon. For a mix of GHGs, it is obtained by combining the equivalent CO2 emissions of each gas. Equivalent CO2 emission is a standard and useful metric for comparing emissions of different GHGs but does not imply the same climate change responses.
42 42  )))
43 43  |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
44 44  ====== **Expected Outputs** ======
... ... @@ -55,8 +55,11 @@
55 55  |(% style="width:211px" %)(((
56 56  ====== **Links and references** ======
57 57  )))|(% style="width:730px" %)(((
58 -* Goedkoop, M., Heijungs, R., Huijbergts, M., Schryver, A.D., Struijs, J., van Zelm, R., 2009. ReCiPe 2008 A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level First edition Report I: Characterisation. URL: https:~/~/www.leidenuniv.nl/cml/ssp/publications/recipe_char acterisation.pdf Date of access: November 2017.
59 -* Gerdes, H., Bassi, S., Portale, E., Mazza, L., Srebotnjak, T., Porch, L., 2011. In Stream, D2.2 Final Report: Evaluation of Indicators for EU Policy Objectives. URL: https:~/~/www.ecologic.eu/sites/files/publication/2016/1901- final-report-d2-2-evaluation-of-indicators-for-eu-policy objectives.pdf Date of access: November 2017.
56 +* Levasseur, A., Cavalett, O., Fuglestvedt, J.S., Gasser, T., Johanssonf, D.J.A, Jørgenseng, S.V., Raugei, M., Reisinger, A., Schivley, G., Strømman, A., Tanaka, K., Cherubini, F., 2016. Enhancing life cycle impact assessment from climate science: Review of recent findings and recommendations for application to LCA. Ecological Indicators, 71, 163 – 174
57 +* Devkota, J., Schlachter, H., Anand, C., Phillips, R., Apul, D., 2013. Development and application of EEAST: A life cycle based model for use of harvested rainwater and composting toilets in buildings. Journal of Environmental Management, 130, 397 – 404.
58 +* Hohne, N., Harnisch, J., (Ed. VanHam, J., Baede, A.P.M., Guicherit, R., Williams Jacobse, J.G.F.), 2002. Evaluating indicators for the relative responsibility for climate change - alternatives to the Brazilian proposal and global warming potentials in Non-C02 Greenhouse Gases: Scientific Understanding, Control Options and Policy Aspects, 371 – 376.
59 +* Carabaño, R., Bedoya, C., Ruiz, D. (2014). Análisis de ciclo de vida de una nueva solución arquitectónica que mejora el rendimiento térmico de la envolvente del edificio: Fachada Natural Aljibe. Informes de la Construcción, 66(535): e034
60 +* Pan, L., Chu, L.M., 2016. Energy saving potential and life cycle environmental impacts of a vertical greenery system in Hong Kong: A case study. Building and Environment, 96, 293 - 300
60 60  )))
61 61  
62 62  (% class="lead" %)