Changes for page 3. Metrics and Key Performance Indicators
Last modified by Hyunji Cho on 2022/07/04 14:40
From version 1.1
edited by Emily West
on 2022/01/10 14:13
on 2022/01/10 14:13
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 5.1
edited by Hyunji Cho
on 2022/06/01 13:02
on 2022/06/01 13:02
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -XWiki. emilywest1 +XWiki.hyunjicho - Content
-
... ... @@ -1,3 +1,65 @@ 1 1 === Section 5: D2.1: Metrics and Key Performance Indicators === 2 2 3 +**Structure of indicators and metrics in DivAirCity** 4 + 5 + 6 +From the literature review and review of existing project results, the consolidated impacts, indicators, and metrics structure were developed. It reflects the multi-dimensional aspects of DivAirCity by including three impact areas, co-creation phases and cities to support each co-creation stage. The resulting indicators and metrics structure is the “ideal” structure given the latest state of the art and the expected impact assessments required at project and city levels in DivAirCity. 7 + 8 +The indicators have been suggested by technical stakeholders and city partners from both theoretical and practical viewpoints. The initial full list has been narrowed down into indicators which are presented in this section. In the selection processes, four main criteria were applied: 9 + 10 +* the crucial indicators to provide data regarding air quality and 6+1 groups; 11 +* the indicators contributing to inclusive governance; 12 +* the indicators which are relevant to all five cities; 13 +* the indicators to provide the data for target impacts (see page 9). 14 + 15 +This initial selection process was conducted before validating the practicality based on the consultation with each city. In other words, these selected sets include both indicators that can easily be completed through the existing data and that might be challenging to collect but important. Through the future validation task, these selected sets of indicators will also contribute to identifying the data gap between the data which already exists and the data required for addressing equal access for diverse members of society to healthy air quality. 16 + 17 + 18 +(% class="table-bordered" %) 19 +|((( 3 3 21 +)))|(% colspan="5" %)**Co-creation phases** 22 +|**Impact areas **|**A) Understanding & establishing co-creation **|**B) Define & co-designing **|((( 23 +**C) Materialising & co-implementing ** 24 + 25 + 26 +)))|**D) Ensuring sustainability **|** E) Co-monitoring** 27 +|((( 28 +**Impact area 1. Social** 29 + 30 + 31 +)))|((( 32 +//Data cluster 1.1.// 33 + 34 +People and governance indicators 35 +)))|(% colspan="3" %)((( 36 +//Data cluster 1.2.// 37 + 38 +Participation and governance dynamic indicators 39 + 40 + 41 +)))|((( 42 +//Data cluster 1.3.// 43 + 44 +Social monitoring indicators 45 +))) 46 +|((( 47 +**Impact area 2. Environmental** 48 + 49 + 50 +)))|((( 51 +//Data cluster 2.1.// 52 + 53 +Urban assets & infrastructure indicators 54 +)))|(% colspan="3" %)((( 55 +//Data cluster 2.2.// 56 + 57 +Urban environmental dynamic indicators and metrics 58 +)))|//Data cluster 2.3.// Urban environmental monitoring indicators 59 +|**Impact area 3. Economic**|//Data cluster 3.1.// Economic indicators|(% colspan="3" %)((( 60 +//Data cluster 3.2.// 61 + 62 +Economic dynamic indicators 63 +)))|//Data cluster 3.3//. Economic monitoring indicators 64 + 65 +