Wiki source code of 3.10.2 Number of visitors in new recreational areas
Last modified by Emily West on 2022/01/17 13:35
Show last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | = 3.10.2 Number of visitors in new recreational areas = | ||
| 2 | |||
| 3 | |||
| 4 | (% class="table-bordered" %) | ||
| 5 | |=(% style="width: 237px;" %)Pillar of Sustainable Development|=(% style="width: 646px;" %)Societal challenge | ||
| 6 | |(% style="width:237px" %)Planet|(% style="width:646px" %)3 - Green Space Management | ||
| 7 | |||
| 8 | (% class="table-bordered" %) | ||
| 9 | |(% style="width:211px" %)((( | ||
| 10 | ====== **Description** ====== | ||
| 11 | )))|(% style="width:730px" %)The number of visitors can be defined as the amount of people visiting, for leisure purpose over a year, the area where the new infrastructure (both NBS, Hybrid solutions and Grey infrastructures) is implemented. This Indicator will be equal to 0 in the Baseline Scenario and will be assessed in the Design scenarios (e.g., NBS Scenario or Hybrid Scenario) computing the number of new visitors. | ||
| 12 | |(% style="width:211px" %)((( | ||
| 13 | ====== **Scale as linked to D2.2 framework** ====== | ||
| 14 | )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( | ||
| 15 | * Scale of NBS implemented | ||
| 16 | ))) | ||
| 17 | |(% style="width:211px" %)((( | ||
| 18 | ====== **Data source [ link to data framework]** ====== | ||
| 19 | )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( | ||
| 20 | * Public agencies National institute of statistics, Regional tourism agency, Municipalities, etc.) | ||
| 21 | ))) | ||
| 22 | |(% style="width:211px" %)((( | ||
| 23 | ====== **Data needs** ====== | ||
| 24 | )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( | ||
| 25 | * Number of visitors to NBS over time period of collection | ||
| 26 | ))) | ||
| 27 | |(% style="width:211px" %)((( | ||
| 28 | ====== **Expected Outputs** ====== | ||
| 29 | )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( | ||
| 30 | * Unit of measure: number of visitors | ||
| 31 | ))) | ||
| 32 | |(% style="width:211px" %)((( | ||
| 33 | ====== **Calculation methods** ====== | ||
| 34 | )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( | ||
| 35 | * Number of visitors in the area where the new infrastructure (both NBS, Hybrid solutions and Grey infrastructures) is implemented (Model/Survey). | ||
| 36 | ))) | ||
| 37 | |(% style="width:211px" %)((( | ||
| 38 | ====== **Links and references** ====== | ||
| 39 | )))|(% style="width:730px" %)((( | ||
| 40 | * Byrd C., Andersson E., Kronenberg J., Hansen R., Buijs A. (2017). Understanding and Promoting the Values of Urban Green Infrastructure: a learning module. GREEN SURGE project Deliverable 4.5, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark | ||
| 41 | * Raymond C.M., Berry P., Breil M., Nita M.R., Kabisch N., de Bel M., Enzi V., Frantzeskak N., Geneletti D., Cardinaletti M., Lovinger L., Basnou C., Monteiro A., Robrecht H., Sgrigna G., Munari L., Calfapietra C. (2017). An Impact Evaluation Framework to Support Planning and Evaluation of Nature based Solutions Projects. Report prepared by the EKLIPSE Expert Working Group on Nature-based Solutions to Promote Climate Resilience in Urban Areas. Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, United Kingdom | ||
| 42 | * Sandstrom U.F. (2002). Green infrastructure planning in urban Sweden. Planning Practice and Research, 17(4), 373-385. DOI:10.1080/02697450216356 | ||
| 43 | ))) | ||
| 44 | |||
| 45 | (% class="lead" %) | ||
| 46 | Revisions | ||
| 47 | |||
| 48 | (% class="success" %)|(% style="width:68px" %)**Version**|(% style="width:179px" %)**Name**|(% style="width:112px" %)**Date**|(% style="width:636px" %)**Changes made** | ||
| 49 | (% class="active" %)|(% style="width:68px" %)**0.1**|(% style="width:179px" %)Emily (EcoWise)|(% style="width:112px" %)17/01/2022|(% style="width:636px" %)Factsheet created | ||
| 50 | (% class="active" %)|(% style="width:68px" %) |(% style="width:179px" %) |(% style="width:112px" %) |(% style="width:636px" %) | ||
| 51 | |||
| 52 |
